Skip to main content

Wilson v. State

Citations

  • 448 S.W.3d 418
  • 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 963
  • 2014 WL 4627264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding evidence was legally sufficient to support harassment conviction based on content of six calls combined with evidence of defendant’s combative conduct and verbal abuse toward the complainant
  • disavowing quoted portion of definition but agreeing with opinion’s reference to dictionary definition of “repeated” as “reiterated,” “recurring,” or “frequent”
  • disavowing statement in Scott, made in context of First Amendment challenge, that statutory term “repeated” could be narrowly construed to apply only to activity occurring in close enough proximity to properly be termed a single episode
  • disavowing statement in Scott, made in context of First Amendment challenge, that statutory term “repeated” could be narrowly construed to apply only to activity occurring in close enough proximity to properly be termed a single episode
  • disavowing statement in Scott, made in context of First Amendment challenge, that statutory term \repeated\ could be narrowly construed to apply only to activity occurring in close enough proximity to properly be termed a single episode
  • denial of rehearing, followed by dissent from denial by Alcala, J., joined by Johnson and Cochran, JJ.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcala, Cochran, Hervey, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.