Skip to main content

Porath v. State

Citations

  • 148 S.W.3d 402
  • 2004 WL 1660763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court, when determining admissibility, may review images without the benefit of expert testimony to determine whether the State met its burden to show that the images depicted real children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eva M. Guzman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Porath v. State

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.