Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/9/2014

Yazdchi v. State

Citations

428 S.W.3d 831
2014 WL 1375461
2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that because statutory construction is a question of law, appellate review of a lower court’s interpretation of a statute is de novo
concluding that preservation of complaint for appellate review requires, among other things, that defendant obtain ruling on objection made to trial court
concluding that because statutory construction is question of law, appellate review of lower court’s interpretation of statute is de novo
concluding that preservation of complaint for appellate review requires defendant to make specific objection, obtain ruling on that objection, and present point of error on appeal comporting with objection made to trial court
concluding that complaint on appeal must correspond to objection made at trial
stating that, for a party to preserve a complaint for appellate review, he must make a specific objection and obtain a ruling at the earliest possible opportunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcala, Keller, Meyers, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Price, Womack, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

185 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.