Skip to main content

Wilson v. State

Citations

  • 931 N.E.2d 914
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 1454
  • 2010 WL 3154021

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the improper admission of the defendant’s driving record was not fundamental error, in part, because it was the only evidence relating to the defendant’s character
  • holding that defendant’s failure to request continuance waived any appellate claim regarding the trial court’s ruling permitting State to amend the charging information the day before trial
  • providing that the failure to raise an objection or challenge an issue at trial results in waiver of the issue on appeal
  • explaining that “a defendant’s failure to request a continuance after a trial court allows a pre-trial substantive amendment to the charging information over defendant’s objection results in waiver”
  • “The failure to raise an issue at trial waives the issue on appeal.”
  • “The failure to raise an issue at trial waives the issue on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bradford, Brown, Darden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.