Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 98 S.W.3d 189
  • 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 33
  • 2003 WL 292112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that party must continue to object each time objectionable evidence is offered to preserve error
  • holding that one must continue to object to evidence believed improper or request a running objection to preserve the complaint
  • holding that one must continue to object to evidence believed improper or request a running objection to preserve the complaint
  • holding that one must continue to object to evidence believed improper or request a running objection to preserve the complaint
  • holding that one must continue to object to evidence believed improper or request a running objection to preserve the complaint
  • holding that one must object each time inappropriate activity occurs or request a continuing objection when his first complaint is overruled, otherwise the complaint is waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

348 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.