Brandon Robisheaux v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that State’s need for extraneous evidence weighed “strongly in favor of admission” because the case was based on the complainant’s testimony alone
• noting that the State’s need for extraneous-offense evidence was high when appellant argued that complainant had fabricated her allegations
• determining that State’s need for evidence “weighs strongly in favor of admission” because without the evidence, the State’s case would have amounted to the complainant’s word against the defendant’s
• recognizing trial courts are given “especially high level of deference” for Rule 403 determinations
• defense brought up the child-victim’s prior mental-health treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).