Skip to main content
· 9/11/2008

Rothstein v. State

Citations

  • 267 S.W.3d 366
  • 2008 WL 2986396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating party fails to preserve error when contention urged on appeal does not comport with specific complaint made in trial court
  • “An objection stating one legal theory may not be used to support a different legal theory on appeal.”
  • “An objection stating one legal theory may not be used to support a different legal theory on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John S. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.