Skip to main content
· 12/2/1985

United States v. Arthur Thomas Nixon, David L. Snoddy and Donald E. Gilbreth, Defendant

Citations

  • 777 F.2d 958
  • 19 Fed. R. Serv. 932
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court's refusal to order production of government files under 17(c) because in camera inspection revealed that materials were not relevant
  • United States Attorney's belief in the defendant's prior misconduct was reasonable where she relied, in part, on statements by state police officers that the defendant had transported cocaine on a bus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Garza, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.