Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/19/1984

Wilson v. State

Citations

692 S.W.2d 661
1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting at the time Wilson was decided that the State did not have the right to appeal the granting of a motion to suppress
noting at the time Wilson was decided that the State did not have the right to appeal the granting of a motion to suppress
holding that the reviewing court may properly sustain the trial court’s denial of suppression motion on the ground that evidence failed to establish standing as a matter of law, even though the record does not reflect the issue was ever considered by the parties or by the trial court
describing sandbagging as when the State takes a position on appeal inconsistent with its position in the trial court
after court of appeals decided standing in State's favor, appellant filed petition for discretionary review raising standing as ground for review
after court of appeals decided standing in State’s favor, appellant filed petition for discretionary review raising standing as ground for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Onion, Clinton, Teague, Miller, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.