US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the [ADA]'s silence about the exempting effect of neutral rules\ favored finding no exemption from reasonable accommodation requirement even when accommodations interfered with employer's neutral seniority system
• holding that “the [ADA]’s silence about the exempting effect of neutral rules” favored finding no exemption from reasonable accommodation requirement even when accommodations interfered with employer’s neutral seniority system
• holding that a plaintiff must notify her employer that she is disabled and desires accommodation
• recognizing that the lowers courts have unanimously found that collectively bargained seniority trumps the need for reasonable accommodation
• holding that “summary judgment is available ... where there is no genuine dispute that the employer has engaged in the interactive process in good faith.”
• holding that in the run of cases reassignment is a reasonable accommodation, but is generally unreasonable if the reassignment would violate “the rules of a seniority system”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett
  Supreme Court· 2001-04-16· cited 5×
• US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett
  Supreme Court· 2001-04-16