Skip to main content
· 2/28/1985

Thomas Jasany v. United States Postal Service

Citations

  • 755 F.2d 1244
  • 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 210
  • 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 706
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29763
  • 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “post office was not required to accommodate [plaintiff] by eliminating one of the essential functions of [the] job”
  • “[An employer] is not required to accommodate [plaintiff] by eliminating one of the essential functions of his job.”
  • \the impairment at issue must be evaluated with reference to the individual job seeker\
  • plaintiff’s burden to show handicap

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Martin, Wellford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.