· 8/10/2005
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Judith Keane, Intervening v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
Citations
- 417 F.3d 789
- 16 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1761
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16707
- 2 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a reasonable jury could find that a plaintiffs neuropathy, which prevented the plaintiff from walking more than' one city block, was a substantial limitation compared to the walking that most people do daily
- concluding that a reasonable jury could find that the employer caused a breakdown of the interactive process even though the employee quit where, prior to the employee’s departure, she made several requests for accommodation
- holding that a reasonable jury could find that a plaintiff’s neuropathy, which pre- vented the plaintiff from walking more than one city block, was a substantial limitation compared to the walking that most people do daily
- concluding that a reasonable jury could find that the employer caused a breakdown of the interactive process even though the No. 06-1986 Page 5 employee quit where, prior to the employee’s departure, she made several requests for accommodation
- noting that “the ADA requires that em- ployer and employee engage in an interactive process to determine a reasonable accommodation”
- holding district court erred in granting summary judgment to employer in finding plaintiff caused the breakdown in the interactive process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Kanne, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.