Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]n employee is not required to use any particular language when requesting an accommodation but need only inform the employer of the need for an adjustment due to a medical condition.” (cleaned up)
• holding that “[a]n employee is not required to use any particular language when requesting an accommodation but need only inform the employer of the need for an adjustment due to a medical condition.” (cleaned up)
• holding that pro se plaintiff’s good-faith mistake as to 25 the deadline for demanding a jury trial establishes no more than inadvertence, which is not a 26 sufficient basis to grant relief from an untimely jury demand
• explaining that a case schedule may be modified if the 2 current schedule cannot be followed despite the moving party’s diligence
• stating that employer’s notice of employee’s need for accommodation triggers ADA duty to engage in interactive process
• indicating that the interactive process under the 5 ADA requires, inter alia, “offering an accommodation that is reasonable and effective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).