Michael E. Kleiber v. Honda of America Mfg., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that reasonable jury could not conclude that vacancy existed because plaintiff had provided no evidence of one
• holding that ADA discrimination “claims premised upon an employer’s failure to offer a reasonable accommodation necessarily involve direct evidence (the failure to accommodate) of discrimination”
• holding that evidence of the plaintiff’s medical “limitations rendered him unqualified” for reassignment to the positions he sought as reasonable accommodations for his disability, despite his assertions that he “could have performed” them
• concluding that the employee failed to demonstrate employer’s bad faith during the interactive process because the employee admitted personnel acted “very professional,” as well as visited the production line to identify other jobs the employee could perform
• noting that the employer's visits to the manufacturing line to try to identify appropriate jobs for the employee was evidence of participating in the interactive process in good faith
• noting that the employer’s visits to the manufacturing line to try to identify appropriate jobs for the employee was evidence of participating in the interactive process in good faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).