Linda Solomon v. Thomas Vilsack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an argument made for the first time in a reply brief in district court is forfeited
• recognizing that an employer’s essential functions are determined by the employer’s description and how the job is performed in practice
• holding that “requesting in good faith a reasonable accommodation is a protected activity under 42 U.S.C. § 12203”
• holding that “the act of requesting in good faith a reasonable accommodation is protected activity” for purposes of retaliation claims brought under the Rehabilitation Act
• holding that the act of requesting in good faith a reasonable accommodation is a protected activity under 42 U.S.C. § 12203
• recognizing that a plaintiff could bring a retaliation claim premised on the denial of an accommodation request following EEO activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).