D.C. Circuit· 8/15/2014

Linda Solomon v. Thomas Vilsack

Citations

412 U.S. App. D.C. 127
763 F.3d 1
30 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 649
2014 WL 4065613
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that an argument made for the first time in a reply brief in district court is forfeited
recognizing that an employer’s essential functions are determined by the employer’s description and how the job is performed in practice
holding that “requesting in good faith a reasonable accommodation is a protected activity under 42 U.S.C. § 12203”
holding that “the act of requesting in good faith a reasonable accommodation is protected activity” for purposes of retaliation claims brought under the Rehabilitation Act
holding that the act of requesting in good faith a reasonable accommodation is a protected activity under 42 U.S.C. § 12203
recognizing that a plaintiff could bring a retaliation claim premised on the denial of an accommodation request following EEO activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Millett, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

144 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.