Donna Hendricks-Robinson, Penny Moore, Teresa Westlake v. Excel Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was a genuine issue “whether the injured employees knew that the jobs in which they initially were placed were truly temporary or whether they could consider the jobs a reasonable accommodation for their impairments”
• noting that “the temporary nature of a light-duty program should not be adjudged by the absoluteness of the time period in which an injured employee may participate”
• refusing to grant summary judgment to an employer because it may not have participated in good faith in finding accommodation
• finding that a question of fact remained for trial as to whether the light-duty jobs were actually reserved for those individuals needing temporary accommodations of their disabilities or whether the jobs had been treated as permanent positions
• Refusing to grant an employer summary judgment because it may not have participated in good faith in finding accommodations
• Refusing to grant an employer summary judgment because it may not have participated in good faith in finding accommodations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).