Skip to main content
· 7/30/2003

Davidson v. America Online, Inc.

Citations

  • 337 F.3d 1179
  • 14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1185
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15239
  • 2003 WL 21752934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that employment discrimination claim accrues - on date employee is notified of adverse employment- decision
  • explaining that some deference is due because “[djeter-mining whether a particular function is essential is a factual inquiry”
  • stating that evidence of what an employer thinks is an essential job function is important, but not conclusive
  • stating that evidence of what an employer thinks is an essential job function is important, but not conclusive
  • “Determining whether a particular function is essential is a factual inquiry.”
  • “Determining whether a particular function is essential is a factual inquiry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Lucero, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.