· 7/30/2003
Davidson v. America Online, Inc.
Citations
- 337 F.3d 1179
- 14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1185
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15239
- 2003 WL 21752934
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that employment discrimination claim accrues - on date employee is notified of adverse employment- decision
- explaining that some deference is due because “[djeter-mining whether a particular function is essential is a factual inquiry”
- stating that evidence of what an employer thinks is an essential job function is important, but not conclusive
- stating that evidence of what an employer thinks is an essential job function is important, but not conclusive
- “Determining whether a particular function is essential is a factual inquiry.”
- “Determining whether a particular function is essential is a factual inquiry.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartz, Lucero, Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.