Skip to main content
· 6/15/2015

Adams v. Anne Arundel County Public Schools

Citations

  • 789 F.3d 422
  • 31 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1275
  • 24 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1522
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10031
  • 2015 WL 3651735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that written warnings and verbal reprimands did not qualify as adverse employment actions “because they did not lead to further discipline”
  • holding that, for the purposes of a Family Medical Leave Act claim, “neither the written nor the verbal reprimands qualify as adverse employment actions, because they did not lead to further discipline”
  • concluding that, for the purposes of a Family Medical Leave Act claim, “neither the written nor the verbal reprimands qualify as adverse employment actions, because they did not lead to further discipline”
  • recognizing that the law requires a reasonable accommodation, and not a perfect accommodation, and that “[h]indsight must not underestimate hard choices that employers, in consultation with their employees and medical professionals, confront at the time”
  • holding a reprimand letter was not an adverse employment action because it did not change the plaintiff’s employment conditions
  • holding “written nor the verbal reprimands qualify as adverse employment actions, because they did not lead to further discipline”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Traxler, Wilkinson, Floyd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.