Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. C.R. England, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that one element of a disability discrimination claim under the ADA is discrimination based on disability
• holding that an employer’s duty to participate in the interactive party is triggered by an employee’s adequate notice that informs the employer of the disability and requests accommodation
• holding that a request must be “sufficiently direct and specific” (cleaned up)
• recognizing that the ADA and Title VII are generally interpreted consist- ently
• holding that a request must be “sufficiently direct and specific” (cleaned up)
• holding that pretext for ADA discrimination can be shown if proffered reasons for employment action are “so incoherent, weak, inconsistent, or contradictory that a rational factfinder could conclude they are unworthy of belief’ (brackets and quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).