Brenda Brown v. City of Tucson, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Arizona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff who claims he has been threatened in violation of the ADA must allege a “distinct and palpable injury”
• noting that the ADA’s anti-interference provision “clearly prohibits a supervisor from threatening an individual with transfer, demotion, or forced retirement unless the individual foregoes a statutorily protected accommodation”
• finding that the construction and application of the ADA anti-interference provision “ought to be guided by our treatment of the FHA’s interference provision . . . as well as similar provisions in the FMLA and NLRA”
• setting forth elements of a prima facie case of ADA retaliation, and requirements for establishing pretext
• applying the FHA interreference standard to the ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).