Oregon Supreme Court· 6/17/1993

State v. Pratt

Citations

853 P.2d 827
316 Or. 561
1993 Ore. LEXIS 86

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an earlier appellate ruling that a warrantless arrest was constitutional precluded reconsidering that issue on the defendant’s second appeal
holding that an earlier appellate ruling that a warrantless arrest was constitutional precluded reconsidering that issue on the defendant’s second appeal
approving instruction that included statement that “reasonable doubt means an honest uncertainty’ as to the facts alleged
affirming denial of motion for mistrial based on improper witness testimony, noting that the trial judge “was present throughout the entire trial and * * * heard the inadvertent testimony in its full context”
law of the case doctrine applies “when a ruling or decision has been once made in a particular case by an appellate court”
“OEC 609 provided its own test for balancing probative value against prejudicial effect,” separate from that found in OEC 403

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette, Fadeley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Pratt

124 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.