Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Oregon Supreme Court· 2/11/1993

State v. Tucker

Citations

  • 845 P.2d 904
  • 315 Or. 321
  • 1993 Ore. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the requirements for separate convictions under former ORS 161.062(1) (1985), repealed by Or. Laws 1999, ch 136, § 1-which is the \not quite identical twin\ of ORS 161.067(1), State v. Crotsley , 308 Or. 272 , 276 n. 3, 779 P.2d 600 (1989
  • stating that \[underlying felonies] were lesser included offenses of aggravated felony murder\
  • rejecting argument that the term “criminal acts of violence,” as that phrase was used in ORS 163.150(1)(b)(B
  • affirming trial court’s denial of the defendant’s requested instructions regarding specific factors that it should consider in mitigation of his sentence on the ground that the instructions were comments on the evidence, pro- hibited by ORCP 59 E
  • affirming trial court’s denial of the defendant’s requested instructions regarding specific factors that it should consider in mitigation of his sentence on the ground that the instructions were comments on the evidence, pro- hibited by ORCP 59 E
  • affirming trial court’s denial of the defendant’s requested instructions regarding specific factors that it should consider in mitigation of his sentence on the ground that the instructions were comments on the evidence, pro- hibited by ORCP 59 E

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber, Unis, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.