Oregon Supreme Court· 12/6/1996

State v. Moore

Citations

927 P.2d 1073
324 Or. 396
1996 Ore. LEXIS 128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that ORS 163.150(l)(b)(D) allows for meaningful judicial review of jury’s decision to impose death sentence and rejecting defendant’s argument that Due Process Clause requires “excessiveness” review in death-penalty cases
holding that defendant’s belief in white supremacy, together with the evidence of his related conduct, was probative of his future dangerousness
noting that rational juror standard applies to review challenge to jury findings under ORS 163.150(l)(b)
noting that the testimony of a single nonlegislator says little “about the intent of the Oregon Legislative Assembly as a whole”
explaining that evidence that defendant had acted on his beliefs made the existence of those beliefs relevant to the penalty-phase issues in an aggravated murder trial
declining to consider whether disputed evidence would be admissible under ORS 163.150(l)(b)(D) in light of determination that evidence was relevant under ORS 163.150(l)(b)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, C.J., and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber and Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.