Oregon Supreme Court· 7/9/1992

State v. Isom

Citations

837 P.2d 491
313 Or. 391
1992 Ore. LEXIS 136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the “standard for holding that a sentence is disproportionate to the offense” is whether the sentence is “so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the moral sense of all reasonable persons as to what is right and proper”
court construed Oregon Criminal Code by reference to a section therein that “instructed * * * as to how we are to construe its provisions”
\It is clear * * * that the legislature intends that Oregon courts sentence criminal defendants under the statutory scheme in force when a particular criminal act was committed.\
“It is clear * * * that the legislature intends that Oregon courts sentence criminal defendants under the statutory scheme in force when a particular criminal act was committed.”
the legislature “intends that Oregon courts sentence criminal defendants under the statutory scheme in force when a particular criminal act was committed”
“[a]n objection on one ground is not sufficient to preserve some other objection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette, Fadeley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.