Skip to main content

State v. King

Citations

  • 768 P.2d 391
  • 307 Or. 332
  • 1989 Ore. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, in evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case, “[o]ur decision is not whether we believe defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but whether the evidence is sufficient for a jury so to find”
  • explaining that it is not proper for a reviewing court to reverse a conviction “because of conflicts in the evidence. After a verdict of guilty, such conflicts must be treated as if they had been decided in the state’s favor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Linde, Campbell, Carson, Jones, Gillette, Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

127 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.