Skip to main content

State v. Coe

Citations

  • 750 P.2d 208
  • 109 Wash. 2d 832
  • 1988 Wash. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that threatened use is not included in the definition of first degree robbery
  • recognizing that threatened use is not included in the definition of first degree robbery
  • noting that the legislature has taken no action to abrogate de facto parentage
  • after a substantial period of time, legislative inaction may be deemed acquiescence in the court’s decision
  • Utter and Goodloe, JJ., and Cunningham, J. Pro Tem., concurring with Dolliver, J.; four justices dissented on issues not relevant to this quote
  • Utter and Goodloe, JJ., and Cunningham, J. Pro Tern., concurring with Dolliver, J.; four justices dissented on issues not relevant to this quote

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dolliver, Goodloe, Dore, Andersen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.