· 5/11/1960
Rosentool v. Bonanza Oil and Mine Corp.
Citations
- 352 P.2d 138
- 221 Or. 520
- 1960 Ore. LEXIS 472
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- legislature would have placed the words “upon proof of a proper purpose” in the statute had it so intended, and this court is precluded from adding the words to the statute
- legislature would have placed the words \upon proof of a proper purpose\ in the statute had it so intended, and this court is precluded from adding the words to the statute
- legislature would have placed the words “upon such proof of proper purpose” in the statute had it so intended and this court is precluded from adding the words to the statute
- legislature would have placed the words \upon such proof of proper purpose\ in the statute had it so intended and this court is precluded from adding the words to the statute
- legislature would have placed the words \upon proof of a proper purpose\ in the statute had it so intended, and this court is precluded from adding the words to the statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McAllister, Perry, Goodwin, Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.