Utah Supreme Court· 2/23/2001
State v. Lafferty
Citations
- 2001 UT 19
- 20 P.3d 342
- 415 Utah Adv. Rep. 29
- 2001 Utah LEXIS 29
- 2001 WL 175211
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court erred by not granting a formal stay while competency proceedings were pending
- permitting insanity defense for Mormon fundamentalist who killed his sister-in-law and her infant child based on God’s “removal revelation”
- upholding death sentence applying law, including the insanity defense, as it existed at the time of the offense
- Mormon fundamentalist, who killed his sister-in-law and her infant child pursuant to God’s “removal revelation,” presented insanity defense to jury
- “The decision to conduct yet another hearing ... depends on the ‘showing made, and the length of time elapsed from the prior psychiatric examination.’ ”
- death sentence upheld where defendant was the “principle actor” who had “masterminded the scheme” that resulted in the deaths
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howe, Russon, Durham, Durrant, Wilkins, Howe'S
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jeffrey D. Lundgren v. Betty Mitchell, WardenSixth Circuit· 2006-03-13· cited 562×
- State v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court· 2010-10-05· cited 554×
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court· 2012-07-27· cited 176×
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2012-07-30· cited 168×
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-14· cited 127×
- State v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court· 2015-03-13· cited 94×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-05-16· cited 85×
- Gallivan v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court· 2002-08-26· cited 70×
- State v. ArguellesUtah Supreme Court· 2003-01-14· cited 68×
- State v. PereaUtah Supreme Court· 2013-11-15· cited 64×
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-29· cited 62×
- State v. HonieUtah Supreme Court· 2002-01-11· cited 54×
- State v. KellUtah Supreme Court· 2002-11-01· cited 52×
- Lafferty v. StateUtah Supreme Court· 2007-09-14· cited 51×
- Rusha v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-10-21· cited 51×
- Gardner v. StateUtah Supreme Court· 2010-06-14· cited 49×
- State v. MetUtah Supreme Court· 2016-11-21· cited 42×
- State v. HolmUtah Supreme Court· 2006-05-16· cited 40×
- State v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2001-05-16· cited 34×
- State v. PiperSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-01-04· cited 32×
Cites
113 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,718×
- Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 1,649×
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,501×
- Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 1,385×
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 1,348×
- California v. BrownSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,207×
- Saffle v. ParksSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 1,054×
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 864×
- People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 674×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.