Oregon Supreme Court· 7/29/1999

State v. Barone

Citations

986 P.2d 5
329 Or. 210
1999 Ore. LEXIS 504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that this court “has not adopted the doctrine of ‘structural’ or ‘systemic’ error in analyzing questions of Oregon law”
holding that a letter that could be construed as an attempt to tamper with a witness was relevant to the defendant's consciousness of guilt
recognizing that prosecution may not put accomplice on witness stand solely for purpose of having accomplice invoke Fifth Amendment privilege in front of jury unless accomplice no longer possessed valid Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
holding that the right against self-incrimination did not preclude the government from compelling a co-defendant to testify at Mr. Barone’s trial even though the co-defendant expressed an intent to file a post-conviction petition collaterally attacking his conviction
finding no different analysis needed for untimeliness of oath administration before or after deliberation had begun
reviewing trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for change of venue, considering only the evidence “that was before the trial court at the time of the motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Leeson, Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.