Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2/26/1979
State v. Pratt
Citations
- 398 A.2d 421
- 284 Md. 516
- 1979 Md. LEXIS 263
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that communications made to a psychiatrist in preparation for an insanity defense are protected by attorney-client privilege
- holding that communications made to a psychiatrist in preparation for an insanity defense are protected by attorney-client privilege
- prosecution use of defense psychiatrist as rebuttal witness violated attorney-client privilege; possible impact on sixth amendment rights noted
- prosecution use of defense psychiatrist as rebuttal witness violated attorney-client privilege; possible impact on sixth amendment rights noted
- in determining whether attorney-client privilege has been waived, “various factors such as the client’s intent to waive, fairness, and consistency of conduct must be considered in view of the purpose of the privilege”
- “the [attorney-client] privilege is ... closely tied to the federal ... constitutional guarantees of the effective assistance of counsel and could, if limited too severely, make these basic guarantees virtually meaningless”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Digges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- State v. BondsWashington Supreme Court· 1982-11-10· cited 163×
- Rubin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-06· cited 102×
- Fraidin v. WeitzmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-09-04· cited 90×
- Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-25· cited 71×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-08-31· cited 63×
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-06-10· cited 54×
- People v. KnucklesIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-04-20· cited 52×
- State v. PawlykWashington Supreme Court· 1990-10-25· cited 52×
- Hutchinson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-09-08· cited 51×
- Donald Lee Noggle v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt.Sixth Circuit· 1983-05-05· cited 49×
- Newman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-13· cited 48×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-09· cited 45×
- Marano v. HollandWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1988-02-01· cited 44×
- Anderson v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-07-30· cited 43×
- State v. DodisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-01-15· cited 40×
- Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-04-29· cited 39×
- City of College Park v. CotterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-06-03· cited 33×
- Gordon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-20· cited 33×
- Ballew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-27· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.