Skip to main content

State v. Pratt

Citations

  • 398 A.2d 421
  • 284 Md. 516
  • 1979 Md. LEXIS 263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that communications made to a psychiatrist in preparation for an insanity defense are protected by attorney-client privilege
  • holding that communications made to a psychiatrist in preparation for an insanity defense are protected by attorney-client privilege
  • prosecution use of defense psychiatrist as rebuttal witness violated attorney-client privilege; possible impact on sixth amendment rights noted
  • prosecution use of defense psychiatrist as rebuttal witness violated attorney-client privilege; possible impact on sixth amendment rights noted
  • in determining whether attorney-client privilege has been waived, “various factors such as the client’s intent to waive, fairness, and consistency of conduct must be considered in view of the purpose of the privilege”
  • “the [attorney-client] privilege is ... closely tied to the federal ... constitutional guarantees of the effective assistance of counsel and could, if limited too severely, make these basic guarantees virtually meaningless”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Digges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.