Oregon Supreme Court· 9/18/1984

State v. Hubbard

Citations

688 P.2d 1311
297 Or. 789
1984 Ore. LEXIS 1725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that exclusion of bias evidence is not harmless where “the impeached witness [was] the sole witness on a given issue and there [was] no corroborating evidence”
stating that OEC 403 “codifies existing law”
stating that OEC 403 \codifies existing law\
\A principle of evidence law in Oregon is that: It is always permissible to show the interest or bias of an adverse witness.\ (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
“A principle of evidence law in Oregon is that: It is always permissible to show the interest or bias of an adverse witness.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
deter- mining that an officer’s motive to avoid future departmen- tal sanctions was relevant impeachment evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Carson, Jones, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Hubbard

125 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.