State v. Pratt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “an objection to [a charging document] requires the closest scrutiny to safeguard the due process rights of an accused”
• expressing the rule stated above

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. DeFoe
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-06-08· cited 30×
• State v. Dunson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-08-18· cited 10×
• State v. Alexander
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-03-26· cited 7×
• State v. Byman
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-08-25· cited 3×
• State v. Wood
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-04-07· cited 3×
• State v. Dunbar
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-04-27· cited 2×
• State v. Ewald
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-08-27· cited 1×
• State v. Ostrem
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-08-09· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Howard
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1896-11-25· cited 37×
• State v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-04-09· cited 25×
• State v. Owens
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-06-05· cited 15×
• State Ex Rel. Masters v. Tahash
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-08-23· cited 12×
• State v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-07-03· cited 5×
• State v. Lehn
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-04-02· cited 3×