Oregon Supreme Court· 11/21/1996

State v. Montez

Citations

927 P.2d 64
324 Or. 343
1996 Ore. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

claim of error not preserved when defendant failed to object to testimony on grounds asserted on appeal
no error in refusing to give requested instruction if the instruction given adequately addresses the subject of the requested instruction
because defendant did not object to testimony on grounds asserted on appeal, claim of error not preserved
refusal to give requested jury instruction not erroneous if instruction given by court \adequately addresses the subject of the requested instruction\
the defendant’s failure to object to testimony on the grounds of relevance or undue prejudice rendered his OEC 401 and OEC 403 arguments unpreserved
“It is not error for a trial court to refuse to give a requested instruction if the instruction given by the court adequately addresses the subject of the requested instruction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.