Welch v. U. S. Bancorp Realty & Mortgage Trust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court was “powerless” to award “necessary” expert expenses and deposition expenses not permitted by statute
• holding court “powerless” to award “necessary” expert expenses and deposition expenses not permitted by statute
• breach of contract to advance funds for residential and commercial development on land tract; \reasonable certainty\ standard applied
• breach of contract to advance funds for residential and commercial development on land tract; “reasonable certainty” standard applied
• “[T]he court should intervene only when it can say that the evidence is clearly insufficient to establish the claim of lost profits.”
• in a contract action, “consequential damages are recoverable if they are reasonably foreseeable”; a plaintiff must prove entitlement to damages by a preponderance of the evidence, and courts should be “wary” of withdrawing allegations of damages from the consideration of the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).