Skip to main content

Sonnier v. State

Citations

  • 913 S.W.2d 511
  • 1995 WL 699923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that while the photographs were gruesome and disagreeable to look at, they depicted nothing more than the reality of the brutal crime committed
  • holding that the facts of the offense alone may be sufficient to support an affirmative answer to the future dangerousness question
  • holding that four photographs showing victims' bodies lying in bloodied water were included in witnesses' testimonial depictions and, therefore, could be admitted
  • holding that objection to entire video recording without specific reference to challenged material did not inform trial court of specific objection and did not preserve error for appeal
  • holding general objection to entire video recording without specific reference to challenged material did not inform trial court of specific objection and did not preserve error for appeal
  • recognizing no error if gruesome crime scene photographs depict nothing more than reality of brutal crime committed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Clinton, Baird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

356 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Sonnier v. State

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.