Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 982 S.W.2d 386
  • 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 113
  • 1998 WL 618992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Texas constitutional right to an impartial jury affords no greater protection than that provided by the Sixth Amendment
  • holding that the Texas constitutional right to an impartial jury affords no greater protection than that provided by the Sixth Amendment
  • holding that veniremember “was not challengeable for cause simply because she stated she would be more skeptical of accomplice witnesses than of witnesses generally”
  • holding that a prospective juror was not challengeable for cause simply because she stated she would be more skeptical of accomplice witnesses than of witnesses generally
  • holding that a prospective juror was not challengeable for cause simply because she stated she would be more skeptical of accomplice witnesses than of witnesses generally
  • holding that Mason v. State Page 2 prospective juror was not challengeable for cause simplybecause she stated she would bemore skeptical ofaccomplice witnesses than ofwitnesses generally

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansfield, McCormick, Keller, Holland, Womack, Price, Baird, Meyers, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

344 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

77 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.