Prible v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that although admission of autopsy photos was error under Rule 403, the State’s use of these autopsy photographs did not affect appellant’s substantial rights
• concluding that extraneous-offense evidence A fills in gaps of the interwoven events @ and of criminal conduct and helps the jury understand the context of the case
• concluding that the extraneous-offense evidence A fills in gaps of the interwoven events and consequences of [the co‑conspirators = ] criminal conduct and thus helps the jury to understand the case in context @
• stating that improperly admitted photographs “pale in comparison to the properly admitted post-mortem photographs of [the alleged victims]”
• stating that improperly admitted photographs \pale in comparison to the properly admitted post-mortem photographs of [the alleged victims]\
• stating that improperly admitted photographs \pale in comparison to the properly admitted post-mortem photographs of [the alleged victims]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).