Skip to main content

King v. State

Citations

  • 953 S.W.2d 266
  • 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 71
  • 1997 WL 587026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the potential harm of the complained-of evidence can be “defused by properly admitted evidence”
  • holding that improperly admitted evidence was not constitutional error
  • holding error harmless with regard to admission of appellant’s fighting and traffic violations as well as marijuana and amphetamine use in “pen packet” when evidence paled in comparison to properly admitted evidence of theft, burglary, and cocaine use
  • announcing the test for determining whether trial error affects a substantial right under Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.2(b) (quoting Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 776, 66 S.Ct. 1239, 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946))
  • holding erroneous admission of records regarding defendant’s previous incarcerations was harmless
  • noting jury could observe escalation in crimes from defendant’s chronological criminal history to assess greater punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Baird, State, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,929 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.