Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 937 S.W.2d 479
  • 1996 WL 724669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in absence of evidence that jury was actually confused, we assume jury would follow court's instructions as given
  • explaining that courts treat alleged errors regarding denials of motions for directed verdicts as challenges to legal sufficiency of evidence
  • treating challenge to denial of motion for directed verdict as challenge to sufficiency of evidence
  • finding prospective juror’s answer on questionnaire that “agreed with the proposition that she does not believe in capital punishment, but it is not practically advisable to abolish it” to be a race-neutral reason for peremptory strike
  • Article 37.071’s requirement that ten or more jurors must agree in order to answer certain special issues “no” held not to violate the Unites States Constitution
  • appellant waived complaint because he did not object to court reporter’s failure to take notes while videotape was played and he did not object at any stage of trial to court reporter’s failure to record his videotaped statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Baird, Overstreet, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

755 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.