Losada v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[r]econciliation of conflicts and contradictions in the evidence is within the exclusive province of the jury”
• holding that confusion of dates “does not in and of itself show perjury” and that “[d]iscrepancies in testimony alone do not make out a case of perjury”
• holding jury is sole judge of witness credibility and may believe some witnesses and refuse to believe others
• holding jury is sole judge of witness credibility and may believe some witnesses and refuse to believe others
• noting that the reconciliation of conflicts and contradictions in the evidence is within the province of the jury; the jury may believe some witnesses and refuse to believe others, and it may accept portions of the testimony of a witness and reject other portions
• \[Reconciliation of conflicts and contradictions in the evidence is within the exclusive province of the jury.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).