Skip to main content
· 9/20/1989

Stoker v. State

Citations

  • 788 S.W.2d 1
  • 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 167
  • 1989 WL 107536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that chain of custody is conclusively proven when the seizing officer testifies: (1) that he seized the physical evidence; (2) that he has identified his personal mark on the evidence; and (3
  • “It is well established that when a defendant offers the same testimony as that objected to, or the same evidence is introduced from another source, without objection, the defendant is not in position to complain on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.