Skip to main content

Chambers v. State

Citations

  • 805 S.W.2d 459
  • 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 35
  • 1991 WL 22990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the complainant’s recantation of her videotaped testimony did not destroy its probative value”
  • holding that “the complainant’s recantation of her videotaped testimony did not destroy its probative value”
  • recognizing that jury, in its exclusive role as factfinder, “is entitled to judge the credibility of witnesses, and can choose to believe all, some, or none of the testimony presented”
  • holding jury as judge of credibility may “believe all, some, or none of the testimony”
  • holding jury as judge of credibility may “believe all, some, or none of the testimony”
  • holding jury as judge of credibility may “believe all, some, or none of the testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Clinton, Overstreet, Maloney, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,094 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Chambers v. State

281 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.