Huizar v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Huizar did not suffer egregious harm from the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the State’s burden at punishment when the punishment assessed by the jury was within the authorized range of punishment
• noting that although ninety-nine year sentence in aggravated sexual assault of child case “may seem to be egregious harm that requires reversal,” this sentence was within permissible statutory punishment range

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).