Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 3/8/1995

Smith v. State

Citations

898 S.W.2d 838
1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 26
1995 WL 92795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that evidence of a plea offer by the State may be relevant, but is substantially outweighed by the danger of both unfair prejudice and of misleading the jury
holding that evidence of a plea offer by the State may be relevant, but is substantially outweighed by the danger of both unfair prejudice and of misleading the jury
holding that different sentencing scheme for capital and non-capital defendants did not violate equal protection; all capital defendants were treated similarly
holding that evidence of a plea offer by the State may be relevant, but is substantially outweighed by the danger of both unfair prejudice and of misleading the jury
holding that evidence of a plea offer by the State may be relevant, but is substantially outweighed by the danger of both unfair prejudice and of misleading the jury
holding that reference to plea negotiations was subject to exclusion under Rule 403 since any minimal relevance it may have had in that case was substantially outweighed by the danger of both unfair prejudice and of misleading the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Baird, Clinton, Maloney, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

188 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

142 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.