Narvaiz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant waived any error by failing to identify where in the record the alleged error occurred
• holding that the proper remedy for a finding of legal insufficiency to support a conviction is an acquittal
• holding complaint forfeited when appellant did not specify where in appellate record alleged error could be found
• holding complaint forfeited when appellant did not specify where in appellate record alleged error could be found
• holding counsel not ineffective for failing to present more mitigating evidence in capital murder trial when defendant did not specify what evidence should have been presented
• holding counsel not ineffective for failing to present more mitigating evidence in capital murder trial when defendant did not specify what evidence should have been presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).