Shirley Hoffman v. Caterpillar, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming exclusion of expert opinion that was based on a video because “the videotape could be played for the jury and entered into evidence, and consequently, jurors could make a determination for themselves”
• “The factual allegations must fairly support the charge of bias or impartiality and must be specific.”
• “The factual allegations must fairly support the charge of bias or impartiality and must be specific.”
• “The factual allegations must fairly support the charge of bias or impartiality and must be specific.”
• “The factual allegations must fairly support the charge of bias or impartiality and must be specific.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).