Mary Lou Miranda v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it “appropriate to borrow” from cases brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e–2000e-17, and other anti- discrimination statutes when analyzing claims under the ADA because the statutes are similar
• “[I]n analyzing claims under the ADA, it is appropriate to borrow from our approach to the respective analog under Title VII.”
• “[I]n analyzing claims under the ADA, it is appropriate to borrow from our approach to the respective analog under Title VII.”
• “[I]n analyzing claims under the ADA, it is appropriate to borrow from our approach to the respective analog under Title VII.”
• “[I]n analyzing claims under the ADA, it is appropriate to borrow from our approach to the respective analog under Title VII.”
• \Such a claim [of a hostile work environment'under\ the ADA]-would seem to arise under the general prohibition against discrimination with respect to terms or conditions of employment contained in § 12112(a).''

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).