Joshua Bunn v. Khoury Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an employee’s hours were reduced based on his own request for vacation days, not for any discriminatory reason
• Explaining that circumstantial, direct evidence may include: “(1) suspicious timing; (2) ambiguous statements or behavior towards other employees in the protected group; (3
• noting that being a \qualified individual\ is an essential element a plaintiff must establish to prevail on a failure-to-accommodate claim
• explaining that the first element of establishing a prima facie case under the ADA requires showing that the individual is disabled, but otherwise the rest of the test mirrors Title VII
• tying adverse employment action to discriminatory animus can be proved with either direct or circumstantial evidence, but direct evidence is “understandably rare in ADA cases”
• affirming award of summary judgment against plaintiff under McDonnell Douglas framework where plaintiff “failed to identify, let alone discuss, a similarly situated, [non-protected-class-member] employee who was treated more favorably”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).