Skip to main content
· 9/5/2002

Maxcene Mays v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Citations

  • 301 F.3d 866
  • 13 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 985
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 18261
  • 2002 WL 2019361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, “an employer is not required to provide the accommodation for a disabled employee that is ideal fi'om the employee’s standpoint, only one that is reasonable in terms of .costs and benefits”
  • doubting that the ability to lift more than ten pounds is a major life activity
  • doubting that the ability to lift more than ten pounds is a major life activity
  • stating that the failure to “jaw about accommodations is harmless” if no reasonable accommodation is possible
  • noting that, although not raised by the parties, the court did not wish to endorse by its silence the view that a nurse whose back injuries restricted her lifting to a maxi- mum of ten pounds was disabled within the meaning of federal disability law
  • expressing “doubt” that a ten-pound lifting restriction is a major life activity under Williams

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.