· 8/12/2005
United States v. Jack A. Day
Citations
- 418 F.3d 746
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16897
- 2005 WL 1924199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district courts have a non‐delegable duty to fix a payment schedule for restitution when the defendant does not have the resources to make immediate payment
- detailing how the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act shaped the statutory history and changed restitution law and procedure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Ripple, Manion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.