Skip to main content
· 8/12/2005

United States v. Jack A. Day

Citations

  • 418 F.3d 746
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16897
  • 2005 WL 1924199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district courts have a non‐delegable duty to fix a payment schedule for restitution when the defendant does not have the resources to make immediate payment
  • detailing how the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act shaped the statutory history and changed restitution law and procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Ripple, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.